Resumen
Los enfoques tradicionales para comprender la percepción visual suponen que el objetivo principal del sistema visual es construir una representación detallada del mundo exterior basada en la retina que, a pesar de la sofisticación del procesamiento, tenga límites computacionales para manejar la cantidad de información incidente y la presencia de ruido (1).Citas
1. Marr D. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman. 1992.
2. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. 1979; 11: 227-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/429816
3. Viviani P, Baud‐Bovy G, Redolfi M. Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: further evidence of motor–perceptual interactions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997; 23(4): 1232–1252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1232
4. Pozzo T, Papaxanthis C, Petit JL, Schweighofer N, Stucchi N. Kinematic features of movement tunes perception and action coupling. Behavioural Brain Research. 2006; 169(1): 75-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2005.12.005
5. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. . Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(9): 661–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35090060
6. Saunier G. Martins EF, Dias EC, de Oliveira JM, Pozzo T, Vargas CD. Electrophysiological correlates of biological motion permanence in humans. Behavioural Brain Research. 2013; 236(1): 166-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.038
7. Serino A, De Filippo C, Casavecchia C, Coccia M, Shiffrar M, Làdavas E. Lesions to the Motor System Affect Action Perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2009; 22(3): 413-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21206.
8. Reed ES. James J Gibson and the Psychology of Perception. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. 1988.
9. Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behavior. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009; 10(12): 861-872. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2735
2. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. 1979; 11: 227-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/429816
3. Viviani P, Baud‐Bovy G, Redolfi M. Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: further evidence of motor–perceptual interactions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997; 23(4): 1232–1252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1232
4. Pozzo T, Papaxanthis C, Petit JL, Schweighofer N, Stucchi N. Kinematic features of movement tunes perception and action coupling. Behavioural Brain Research. 2006; 169(1): 75-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2005.12.005
5. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. . Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(9): 661–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35090060
6. Saunier G. Martins EF, Dias EC, de Oliveira JM, Pozzo T, Vargas CD. Electrophysiological correlates of biological motion permanence in humans. Behavioural Brain Research. 2013; 236(1): 166-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.038
7. Serino A, De Filippo C, Casavecchia C, Coccia M, Shiffrar M, Làdavas E. Lesions to the Motor System Affect Action Perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2009; 22(3): 413-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21206.
8. Reed ES. James J Gibson and the Psychology of Perception. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. 1988.
9. Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behavior. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009; 10(12): 861-872. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2735
No se permite un uso comercial de la obra original ni de las posibles obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales se debe hacer con una licencia igual a la que regula la obra original.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.