Keywords
Suicide
Colombia
Colombia
How to Cite
Campo-Arias, A. ., & Herazo, E. . (2020). Suicide reporting in mass media in the state of Magdalena, Colombia. Duazary, 17(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.3213
Abstract
In 2016 and 2017, the suicide rate in Colombia went up from 5.20 to 5.72, respectively. The same trend was observed for the State of Magdalena for the same period with an increase in the rates that went from 3.37 in 2016 and 4.27 per one hundred thousand inhabitants in 20171,2. The suicide rate in the State of Magdalena occupies third place among the departments of the Colombian Caribbean region1References
1. Montoya, B. Comportamiento del suicidio en Colombia, 2017. Forensis. 2018; 19 (1): 349-83.
2. Rodríguez JM. Comportamiento del suicidio, 2016. Forensis. 2017; 18 (18): 402-36.
3. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet. 2009; 373 (9672): 1372-81.
4. Campo-Arias A, Caamaño BH. Comportamientos autolesivos. En: Pedrozo-Pupo JC, Celemín-Guete GJ. Guía de decisión en urgencias medicina del adulto (GUMA). Santa Marta: Editorial Unimagdalena; 2018. pp. 217-27.
5. Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, Beautris A, Currier D, Hass A, et al. Suicide prevention strategies. A systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 294 (16): 2064-74.
6. Zalsman G, Hawton K, Wasserman D, van Heeringen K, Arensman E, Sarchiapone M, et al. Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016; 3 (7): 646-59.
7. Preventing suicide: a resource for media professionals, update 2017. World Health Organization. Geneva; 2017.
8. Sinyor M, Schaffer A, Heisel MJ, Picard A, Adamson G, Cheung CP, et al. Media guidelines for reporting on suicide: 2017 update of the Canadian Psychiatric Association policy paper. Can J Psychiatry. 2018; 63 (3): 182-96.
9. Sisask M, Värnik A. Media roles in suicide prevention: a systematic review. Int J Environm Res Public Health. 2012; 9 (1): 123-38.
10. Till B, Tran U, Voracek M, Niederkrotenthaler T. Papageno vs. Werther Effect online: randomized controlled trial of beneficial and harmful impacts of educative suicide prevention websites. Br J Psychiatry. 2017; 211 (2): 109-15.
11. Fahey RA, Matsubayashi T, Ueda M. Tracking the Werther Effect on social media: Emotional responses to prominent suicide deaths on twitter and subsequent increases in suicide. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 219 (1): 19-29.
12. Yom-Tov E, Fischer SH. The Werther Effect revisited: Measuring the effect of news items on user behavior. In proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. 2017. pp. 1561-66.
13. Campo-Arias A, Herazo E. El complejo estigma-discriminación asociado a trastorno mental como factor de riesgo de suicidio. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2015; 44 (4): 243-50.
14. Rodríguez-Wangüemert C, Martínez-Torvisco J. Human rights through the paradigm changes of the social communication theories. Int Rev Sociol. 2017; 27 (2): 230-40.
15. Honeycutt A, Praetorius RT. Survivors of suicide: Who they are and how do they heal? Illness Crisis Loss. 2016; 24 (2): 103-18.
2. Rodríguez JM. Comportamiento del suicidio, 2016. Forensis. 2017; 18 (18): 402-36.
3. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet. 2009; 373 (9672): 1372-81.
4. Campo-Arias A, Caamaño BH. Comportamientos autolesivos. En: Pedrozo-Pupo JC, Celemín-Guete GJ. Guía de decisión en urgencias medicina del adulto (GUMA). Santa Marta: Editorial Unimagdalena; 2018. pp. 217-27.
5. Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, Beautris A, Currier D, Hass A, et al. Suicide prevention strategies. A systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 294 (16): 2064-74.
6. Zalsman G, Hawton K, Wasserman D, van Heeringen K, Arensman E, Sarchiapone M, et al. Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016; 3 (7): 646-59.
7. Preventing suicide: a resource for media professionals, update 2017. World Health Organization. Geneva; 2017.
8. Sinyor M, Schaffer A, Heisel MJ, Picard A, Adamson G, Cheung CP, et al. Media guidelines for reporting on suicide: 2017 update of the Canadian Psychiatric Association policy paper. Can J Psychiatry. 2018; 63 (3): 182-96.
9. Sisask M, Värnik A. Media roles in suicide prevention: a systematic review. Int J Environm Res Public Health. 2012; 9 (1): 123-38.
10. Till B, Tran U, Voracek M, Niederkrotenthaler T. Papageno vs. Werther Effect online: randomized controlled trial of beneficial and harmful impacts of educative suicide prevention websites. Br J Psychiatry. 2017; 211 (2): 109-15.
11. Fahey RA, Matsubayashi T, Ueda M. Tracking the Werther Effect on social media: Emotional responses to prominent suicide deaths on twitter and subsequent increases in suicide. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 219 (1): 19-29.
12. Yom-Tov E, Fischer SH. The Werther Effect revisited: Measuring the effect of news items on user behavior. In proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. 2017. pp. 1561-66.
13. Campo-Arias A, Herazo E. El complejo estigma-discriminación asociado a trastorno mental como factor de riesgo de suicidio. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2015; 44 (4): 243-50.
14. Rodríguez-Wangüemert C, Martínez-Torvisco J. Human rights through the paradigm changes of the social communication theories. Int Rev Sociol. 2017; 27 (2): 230-40.
15. Honeycutt A, Praetorius RT. Survivors of suicide: Who they are and how do they heal? Illness Crisis Loss. 2016; 24 (2): 103-18.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.