Informes de suicidio en medios de comunicación en el estado de Magdalena, Colombia
Barra lateral del artículo
Publicado:
ene. 1, 2020
Palabras clave:
Suicidio, Colombia
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
In 2016 and 2017, the suicide rate in Colombia went up from 5.20 to 5.72, respectively. The same trend was observed for the State of Magdalena for the same period with an increase in the rates that went from 3.37 in 2016 and 4.27 per one hundred thousand inhabitants in 20171,2. The suicide rate in the State of Magdalena occupies third place among the departments of the Colombian Caribbean region1
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Detalles del artículo
Cómo citar
Campo-Arias, A. ., & Herazo, E. . (2020). Informes de suicidio en medios de comunicación en el estado de Magdalena, Colombia. Duazary, 17(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.3213
Sección
Editorial
No se permite un uso comercial de la obra original ni de las posibles obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales se debe hacer con una licencia igual a la que regula la obra original.
Citas
1. Montoya, B. Comportamiento del suicidio en Colombia, 2017. Forensis. 2018; 19 (1): 349-83.
2. Rodríguez JM. Comportamiento del suicidio, 2016. Forensis. 2017; 18 (18): 402-36.
3. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet. 2009; 373 (9672): 1372-81.
4. Campo-Arias A, Caamaño BH. Comportamientos autolesivos. En: Pedrozo-Pupo JC, Celemín-Guete GJ. Guía de decisión en urgencias medicina del adulto (GUMA). Santa Marta: Editorial Unimagdalena; 2018. pp. 217-27.
5. Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, Beautris A, Currier D, Hass A, et al. Suicide prevention strategies. A systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 294 (16): 2064-74.
6. Zalsman G, Hawton K, Wasserman D, van Heeringen K, Arensman E, Sarchiapone M, et al. Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016; 3 (7): 646-59.
7. Preventing suicide: a resource for media professionals, update 2017. World Health Organization. Geneva; 2017.
8. Sinyor M, Schaffer A, Heisel MJ, Picard A, Adamson G, Cheung CP, et al. Media guidelines for reporting on suicide: 2017 update of the Canadian Psychiatric Association policy paper. Can J Psychiatry. 2018; 63 (3): 182-96.
9. Sisask M, Värnik A. Media roles in suicide prevention: a systematic review. Int J Environm Res Public Health. 2012; 9 (1): 123-38.
10. Till B, Tran U, Voracek M, Niederkrotenthaler T. Papageno vs. Werther Effect online: randomized controlled trial of beneficial and harmful impacts of educative suicide prevention websites. Br J Psychiatry. 2017; 211 (2): 109-15.
11. Fahey RA, Matsubayashi T, Ueda M. Tracking the Werther Effect on social media: Emotional responses to prominent suicide deaths on twitter and subsequent increases in suicide. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 219 (1): 19-29.
12. Yom-Tov E, Fischer SH. The Werther Effect revisited: Measuring the effect of news items on user behavior. In proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. 2017. pp. 1561-66.
13. Campo-Arias A, Herazo E. El complejo estigma-discriminación asociado a trastorno mental como factor de riesgo de suicidio. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2015; 44 (4): 243-50.
14. Rodríguez-Wangüemert C, Martínez-Torvisco J. Human rights through the paradigm changes of the social communication theories. Int Rev Sociol. 2017; 27 (2): 230-40.
15. Honeycutt A, Praetorius RT. Survivors of suicide: Who they are and how do they heal? Illness Crisis Loss. 2016; 24 (2): 103-18.
2. Rodríguez JM. Comportamiento del suicidio, 2016. Forensis. 2017; 18 (18): 402-36.
3. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet. 2009; 373 (9672): 1372-81.
4. Campo-Arias A, Caamaño BH. Comportamientos autolesivos. En: Pedrozo-Pupo JC, Celemín-Guete GJ. Guía de decisión en urgencias medicina del adulto (GUMA). Santa Marta: Editorial Unimagdalena; 2018. pp. 217-27.
5. Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, Beautris A, Currier D, Hass A, et al. Suicide prevention strategies. A systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 294 (16): 2064-74.
6. Zalsman G, Hawton K, Wasserman D, van Heeringen K, Arensman E, Sarchiapone M, et al. Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016; 3 (7): 646-59.
7. Preventing suicide: a resource for media professionals, update 2017. World Health Organization. Geneva; 2017.
8. Sinyor M, Schaffer A, Heisel MJ, Picard A, Adamson G, Cheung CP, et al. Media guidelines for reporting on suicide: 2017 update of the Canadian Psychiatric Association policy paper. Can J Psychiatry. 2018; 63 (3): 182-96.
9. Sisask M, Värnik A. Media roles in suicide prevention: a systematic review. Int J Environm Res Public Health. 2012; 9 (1): 123-38.
10. Till B, Tran U, Voracek M, Niederkrotenthaler T. Papageno vs. Werther Effect online: randomized controlled trial of beneficial and harmful impacts of educative suicide prevention websites. Br J Psychiatry. 2017; 211 (2): 109-15.
11. Fahey RA, Matsubayashi T, Ueda M. Tracking the Werther Effect on social media: Emotional responses to prominent suicide deaths on twitter and subsequent increases in suicide. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 219 (1): 19-29.
12. Yom-Tov E, Fischer SH. The Werther Effect revisited: Measuring the effect of news items on user behavior. In proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. 2017. pp. 1561-66.
13. Campo-Arias A, Herazo E. El complejo estigma-discriminación asociado a trastorno mental como factor de riesgo de suicidio. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2015; 44 (4): 243-50.
14. Rodríguez-Wangüemert C, Martínez-Torvisco J. Human rights through the paradigm changes of the social communication theories. Int Rev Sociol. 2017; 27 (2): 230-40.
15. Honeycutt A, Praetorius RT. Survivors of suicide: Who they are and how do they heal? Illness Crisis Loss. 2016; 24 (2): 103-18.