¿QUÉ PASA CON EL WAC? ARQUEOLOGÍA Y “COMPROMISO” EN UN MUNDO GLOBALIZADO

Main Article Content

Nick Shepherd
Alejandro Haber

Abstract

The year 2011 marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of the World Archaeological Congress. WAC marked a bold intervention in the politics of knowledge in archaeology in the context of the But how has it fared in contemporary worlds of practice? In this two senior WAC members take a close and critical look at the fortunes, meanings and contexts of the organisation. At its centre, is an account of the meeting between the WAC and Rio Tinto Limited, the mining multinational, in Melbourne in 2007. Other parts of the paper engage with notions of the indigenous, and discuss the assumptions informing the WAC program Without Borders. Framed as a challenge, the paper invites response and commentary, as a way of opening debate which allows us to envisage alternative futures for the discipline, beyond the banal prospect of “Archaeology Inc.”

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Shepherd, N., & Haber, A. (2011). ¿QUÉ PASA CON EL WAC? ARQUEOLOGÍA Y “COMPROMISO” EN UN MUNDO GLOBALIZADO. Jangwa Pana, 10(1), 66–95. https://doi.org/10.21676/16574923.65
Section
Article of scientific and technological research
Author Biography

Nick Shepherd

miembro  Consejo, y es editor de la revista Archaeologies: Journal of the World  Congreso. Alejandro Haber es editor de arqueología , revista afiliada al WAC, y es miembro de distintos  y grupos de trabajo del WAC

References

Anon. (2004). Friends of the Earth International media briefing, 7 April 2004.

Anon. (2007). War Profiteer of the Month: Rio Tinto Alcan. War Resister’s International.

Anon. (2010). World Archaeological Congress. [accessed xxxxxx]. Available at:

< http://www.worldarchaeologicalcongress.org>

Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.

Castells, M. (2010). The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

Comaroff, J. L., Comaroff, J. (2009). Ethnicity Inc. Scottsville: University of -Natal.

Deacon, J. (1986). Editorial. South African Archaeological Bulletin 41:4.

Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of Difference: Place, movements, life, redes. Durham, : Duke University.

Giddens, A. (2009). The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity.

Haber, A. (2009a). Animism, Relatedness, Life: Post-Western perspectives.

Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19:418-30.

Haber, A. (2009b). Back to life: Archaeology and the decolonial turn. In Advanced

Seminar on Theory in Archaeology: South Africa/ Argentina Bilateral.

University of Cape Town.

Hall, M. (2002). Going Local? The World Archaeological Congress and Effective

Action. World Archaeological Bulletin 15:1-9.

Hall, M. & Bombardella, P. (2005). ‘Las Vegas In Africa’. Journal of Social Archaeology (1):5-25.

Hall, S. & du Gay, P., eds. (1996). Questions of Cultural Identity. London: SAGE.

Hall, S., Held, D. & McGrew, T., eds. (1992). Modernity and its Futures. Cambridge:

Polity.

Hamilakis, Y. (2003). Iraq, stewardship and ‘the record’: an ethical crisis for

archaeology. Public Archaeology 3:104-11.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire.

New York: Penguin.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/ Harvard.

Kitchen, W. (1998). From Croatia to Cape Town: the future of the World Archaeological

Congress. Antiquity 72:747-50.

Mignolo, W. (1999). Local Histories/ Global Designs: Coloniality, subaltern

knowledges and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

Mignolo, W. (2008). The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference.

In

M. Morana, E. Dussel & C. A. Jáuregui, eds. (2008). Coloniality at Large: Latin

America and the Postcolonial Debate. Durham: Duke University.

Moody, R. (1992). Plunder: The story of Rio Tinto-Zinc: Partizans.

Perlez, J. & Bonner, R. (2005). Freeport Rio Tinto: Gold’s other price. New York

Times.

RioTinto. (2005). Rio Tinto: The way we work. Melbourne.

RioTinto (2007a). Rio Tinto: Community relations guidance note, cultural heritage

management guidance. Melbourne.

RioTinto (2007b). Rio Tinto: Community relations standard. Melbourne.

RioTinto (2007c). Rio Tinto: Engagement through social and environmental

partnerships and relationships. From global to local. Melbourne.

RioTinto (2007d). Rio Tinto: Working in partnership. Melbourne.

R (2007e). Rio Tinto: Working with communities. Common objectives,

diverse cultures. Melbourne.

RioTinto (2007f). World Archaeological Congress and Rio Tinto Workshop: we “partner” on Heritage Management (Melbourne Business School,-2 October), Melbourne.

Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Shepherd, N. (2006). What Does it Mean to Give the Past Back to the People?

Archaeology and Ethics in the Post-colony. In Y. Hamilakis & P. Duke, eds.,

Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics. London: UCL.

S, N. (2007). Archaeology Dreaming; postapartheid urban imaginaries

and the bones of the Prestwich Street dead. Journal of Social Archaeology 7:3-

Shepherd, N. (2008a). At the Sharp Edge of the Trowel: Archaeology, social movements

and the politics of memory and identity. In Material Worlds Seminar.

Brown University.

Shepherd, N. (2008b). Heritage. In N. Shepherd & S. Robins, eds., New South

African Keywords. Cape Town and Athens, Ohio: Jacana Media and Ohio University.

Shepherd, N. (2010). Keynote Address: Archaeology, Coloniality, Modernity. In

CHAT 2010 (Contemporary and Historical Archaeology and Theory). Oxford

University.

Ucko, P. J. (1987). Academic freedom and apartheid: the story of the World Archaeological

Congress. London: Duckworth.

Vassilopoulos, J. (1997). Rio Tinto: the world’s worst company? Green Left Weekly

West, R. (1972). River of Tears: The story of Rio Tinto-Zinc Mining: Earth Island.