Concordance and consistency in the evaluation of diagnostic images of periapical tissue in endodontics
PDF

Keywords

Endodontics
Radiography Dental
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Periapical Tissue
Statistics and numerical data

How to Cite

García-Guerrero, C., Caicedo-Rosero, Ángela V., Delgado-Rodríguez, C. E., Quijano-Guauque, S., Rodriguez-Godoy, M., & Camargo-Huertas, H. (2021). Concordance and consistency in the evaluation of diagnostic images of periapical tissue in endodontics. Duazary, 18(4), 350–360. https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.4374

Abstract

To estimate the degree of concordance and consistency in the radiographic and tomographic evaluation of the periapical area. A study of diagnostic tests was designed. Three blind evaluators analyzed radiographic images, which were selected at two different points in time. An oral radiologist and an endodontist determined the second observation moment. The degree of similarity and variability, concordance and consistency for each radiograph was set at 95% confidence. A Kappa coefficient (κ), for radiographic findings and a correlation coefficient of Lin (CCC) for tomographic measurements was established. 12 radiographies and 19 tomographs were evaluated. The intraobserver consistency determined a k= 1 (Almost Perfect) and a CCC from 0.42 to 0.95 (Poor to Substantial) for both observation times. For radiographies, the interobserver concordance did not show changes between the first and second observation. Values include a k= 0.56-0.80 (Moderate to Good) and a CCC with greater degree of agreement, after training, as follows: axial view: CCC 0.86, 95% of Confidence Interval (CI) 0.69-0.94, coronal view: CCC 0.90 95%CI 0.75-0.96, and sagittal view: CCC 0.96, 95%CI 0.90-0.98. The statistical tests estimated the consistency and concordance to observe radiographically and tomographically the periapical tissue in endodontics.
https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.4374
PDF

References

Fernández R, Cadavid D, Zapata SM, Alvarez LG, Restrepo FA. Impact of three radiographic methods in the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment: a five-year follow-up. J Endod 2013; 39:1097-103. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 21.

Braz-Silva PH, Bergamini ML, Mardegan AP, De Rosa CS, Hasseus B, Jonasson P. Inflammatory profile of chronic apical periodontitis: a literature review. Acta Odontol Scand 2019;77(3):173-180. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1521005. Epub 2018 Dec 26. PMID: 30585523.

Bornstein MM, Bingisser AC, Reichart PA, Sendi P, Bosshardt DD, von Arx T. Comparison between Radiographic (2-dimensional and 3-dimensional) and Histologic Findings of Periapical Lesions Treated with Apical Surgery. J Endod 2015; 41(6):804–11. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Apr 8. PMID: 25863407.

Tsesis I, Rosen E, Taschieri S, Telishevsky Strauss Y, Ceresoli V, Del Fabbro M. Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: an updated meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod 2013; 39(3): 332–9. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.044.

Serrano-Giménez M, Sánchez-Torres A, Gay-Escoda C. Prognostic factors on periapical surgery: A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2015; 20(6): e715-22. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20613.

Estrela C, Bueno MR, Azevedo BC, Azevedo JR, Pécora JD. A new periapical index based on cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2008; 34(11):1325–31. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.013.

Molven O, Halse A, Grung B. Observer strategy and the radiographic classification of healing after endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 16(4): 432–9. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0901-5027(87)80080-2.

Rud J, Andreasen JO, Jensen JE. Radiographic criteria for the assessment of healing after endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1972; 1(4):195–214. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9785(72)80013-9.

Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003; 228(2): 303-8. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2282011860.

Cortés-Reyes É, Rubio-Romero JA, Gaitán-Duarte H. Métodos estadísticos de evaluación de la concordancia y la reproducibilidad de pruebas diagnósticas. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2010; 61(3):247–55. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18597/rcog.271

Lin LI-K. A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45: 255–68. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2532051

Elzinga M, Segers M, Siebenga J, Heilbron E, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Bakker F. Inter- and intraobserver agreement on the Load Sharing Classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Injury 2012; 43(4): 416-22. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.013.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33(1): 159-74. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2529310

The Scope of Endodontics [Internet]. Dentistry Today. 2015. Available at: https://www.dentistrytoday.com/viewpoint/10061-revisiting-the-scope-of-contemporary-endodontics

Huumonen S, Ørstavik D. Radiological aspects of apical periodontitis. Endod Top 2002; (1):3–25. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-1546.2002.10102.x

Venskutonis T, Daugela P, Strazdas M, Juodzbalys G. Accuracy of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography on periapical radiolucency detection in endodontically treated teeth. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2014;5(2):e1. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2014.5201.

Koran LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 1975;293 (13):642–6. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197509252931307.

Pope O, Sathorn C, Parashos P. A comparative investigation of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of a healthy periapex. J Endod 2014; 40(3):360-5. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.003.

Yu VS, Khin LW, Hsu CS, Yee R, Messer HH. Risk score algorithm for treatment of persistent apical periodontitis. J Dent Res 2014; 93(11):1076-82. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034514549559.

von Arx T, Janner SF, Hänni S, Bornstein MM. Evaluation of New Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Criteria for Radiographic Healing Evaluation after Apical Surgery: Assessment of Repeatability and Reproducibility. J Endod 2016; 42(2):236-42. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.018.

von Arx T, Janner SF, Hänni S, Bornstein MM. Scarring of Soft Tissues Following Apical Surgery: Visual Assessment of Outcomes One Year After Intervention Using the Bern and Manchester Scores. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016; 36(6): 817-823. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.3010.

Delgado-Rodríguez M, Llorca J. Bias. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; (58):635–641. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.008466

Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: a personal history. Int J Epidemiol 1995;24 Suppl 1: S7–14. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/24.supplement_1.s7.

Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A, Kirkevang L-L. Cone beam computed tomography and periapical lesions: a systematic review analysing studies on diagnostic efficacy by a hierarchical model. Int Endod J 2015 Sep;48(9):815–28. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.12388.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Universidad del Magdalena

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.