Keywords
scalpel
cutting effort
incision depth
Rheology
cutting effort
incision depth
Rheology
How to Cite
Taron-Dunoyer, A. ., Díaz-Caballero, A. ., Ávila-Martínez, E. ., & Castellar-Vásquez, E. . (2020). Comparison of strength and depth cut with scalpel on porcine gingival tissues. Duazary, 17(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.3218
Abstract
The composition of the gums confers some physical characteristics that make it resistant to mechanical stimulation. The objective of the study was to compare the difference of the utilized forces when performing cuts in the anterior and posterior sections of porcine gingival tissue, measuring the depth of the tissue. A comparative descriptive study was performed with a non-probability convenience sampling, sectioned pig mandibles were used. The experimental trials were performed with an EZ-S SHIMADZU texture analyzer. All of the samples were submitted to a vertical shear force, thus identified the force level used to perform the incision and its depth. the necessary force to perform a cut in porcine gingival tissue was evaluated, comparing the posterior section (39.3571 Newton and 2.160 mm) and with the anterior ( 37.8424 newton and 1.747 mm), just as the depth of said cut, showing a statistical difference on the depth, (p=0.022 p< 0.59); regarding the force, no statistically significant difference was found. In the analyzed samples where the shear force in the posterior and anterior section were compared, no difference was found in both groups; as for the cut depth, this was greater in the posterior section than in the anterior.References
1. Guzmán A. Cirugía de la cavidad bucal. Dermatol Per. 2001;11(Suppl 1):13-19. Available in http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVRevistas/dermatologia/v11_sup1/cirugia_cav_oral.htm
2. Moreno L, Calderas F. La sangre humana desde el punto de vista de la reología. Mat Avanz. 2013; (20): 33-37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258848400_La_sangre_humana_desde_el_punto_de_vista_de_la_reologia
3. Chen H, Zhao X, Lu X, Kassab G. Non-linear micromechanics of soft tissues. Int J Non Linear Mech. 2013;(56):79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.03.002
4. Chanthasopeephan T, Desai JP, Lau AC. Study of soft tissue cutting forces and cutting speeds. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; (98):56-62. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-942-4-56
5. Carter TJ, Sermesant M, Cash DM, Barratt DC, Tanner C, Hawkes DJ. Application of soft tissue modelling to imageguided surgery. Med Eng Phys. 2005; 27 (10): 893-909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.005
6.Díaz A, Tarón A, Hernández R, Camacho A, Fortich N. Deformation of scalpel blades after incision of gingival tissue in pig mandibles. An ex vivo study. 2017; 21(3): 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rodmex.2017.09.013
7. Carda C, Peydró A. Aspectos estructurales del periodonto de inserción: estudio del tejido óseo. Labor Dental Clínica. 2008;9(6):283-291. Available in:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar /355371.
8. Kondo M, Yamato M, Takagi R, Murakami D, Namiki H, Okano T. Significantly different proliferative potential of oral mucosal epithelial cells between six animal species. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(6):1829-37. https.//doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34849
9. Gundiah N, Ratcliffe MB, Pruitt LA. Determination of strain energy function for arterial elastin: experiments using histology and mechanical tests. J Biomech. 2007; 40(3):586-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.004
10. Chanthasopeephan T, Desai JP, Lau AC, editors. Measuring forces in liver cutting for reality-based haptic display. Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003. (IROS 2003). International Conference on. 2003; 3(4):3083 – 3088. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2003.1249630
11. Tholey G, Chanthasopeephan T, Hu T, Desai JP, Lau A. Measuring grasping and cutting forces for reality-based haptic modeling. International Congress Series. 2003. (1256):794–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5131(03)00492-8
12. Chanthasopeephan T, Desai JP, Lau AC. Modeling soft-tissue deformation prior to cutting for surgical simulation: finite element analysis and study of cutting parameters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(3):349-359. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TBME.2006.886937
13. Mahvash M, Hayward V. Haptic rendering of cutting: A fracture mechanics approach. Haptics-e. 2001;2(3):1-12. Avaliable in: http://hdl.handle.net/1773/34885
14. Ramachandra SS, Mehta DS, Sandesh N, Baliga V, Amarnath. J. Periodontal probing systems: a review of available equipment. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011;32(2):71-7. Avalaible in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21473303
15. Caton J, Greenstein G, Polson A. Depth of Periodontal Probe Penetration Related to Clinical and Histologic Signs of Gingival Inflammation. J Periodontol. 1981;52(10):626-9.
https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1981.52.10.626
16. Al Shayeb K, Turner W, Gillam D. Accuracy and reproducibility of probe forces during simulated periodontal pocket depth measurements. Saudi Dent J. 2014;26(2):50-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.02.001
17. Botero M, Quintero AC. Evaluación de los biotipos periodontales en la dentición. CES odontol. 2001;14(2):13-18. Available in: http://revistas.ces.edu.co/index.php/odontologia/ article/view/689/412
18. Kan J, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010; 30(3):237-43. Available in: http://jidai.ir/aticle-1-1890-en.html
19. Sa G, Xiong X, Wu T, Yang J, He S, Zhao Y. Histological features of oral epithelium in seven animal species: As a reference for selecting animal models. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016 Jan 1;81:10-7.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2015.09.019
20. S Cotin, Delingette H, Ayache, N. A HybridElastic Model allowing Real Time Cutting,
Deformations and Force-Feedback for Surgery Training and Simulation. Virtual Computer journal. 2000; 16 (8):437-452. Available in: https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00615105/document
21. Y Daigo, Masanori Y, Homa O, Yasunori Y, Kanji T. “A comparison between electrocautery and scalpel plus scissor in breast conserving surgery,” Oncol. Rep. 2003; 10:1729–1732. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.10.6.1729
22. H Cassandra, Jensen M. Histological methods for ex vivo axon tracing: A systematic review. Neurological Research. 2016; 38(7): 561-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2016.1153820
2. Moreno L, Calderas F. La sangre humana desde el punto de vista de la reología. Mat Avanz. 2013; (20): 33-37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258848400_La_sangre_humana_desde_el_punto_de_vista_de_la_reologia
3. Chen H, Zhao X, Lu X, Kassab G. Non-linear micromechanics of soft tissues. Int J Non Linear Mech. 2013;(56):79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.03.002
4. Chanthasopeephan T, Desai JP, Lau AC. Study of soft tissue cutting forces and cutting speeds. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; (98):56-62. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-942-4-56
5. Carter TJ, Sermesant M, Cash DM, Barratt DC, Tanner C, Hawkes DJ. Application of soft tissue modelling to imageguided surgery. Med Eng Phys. 2005; 27 (10): 893-909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.005
6.Díaz A, Tarón A, Hernández R, Camacho A, Fortich N. Deformation of scalpel blades after incision of gingival tissue in pig mandibles. An ex vivo study. 2017; 21(3): 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rodmex.2017.09.013
7. Carda C, Peydró A. Aspectos estructurales del periodonto de inserción: estudio del tejido óseo. Labor Dental Clínica. 2008;9(6):283-291. Available in:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar /355371.
8. Kondo M, Yamato M, Takagi R, Murakami D, Namiki H, Okano T. Significantly different proliferative potential of oral mucosal epithelial cells between six animal species. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(6):1829-37. https.//doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34849
9. Gundiah N, Ratcliffe MB, Pruitt LA. Determination of strain energy function for arterial elastin: experiments using histology and mechanical tests. J Biomech. 2007; 40(3):586-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.004
10. Chanthasopeephan T, Desai JP, Lau AC, editors. Measuring forces in liver cutting for reality-based haptic display. Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003. (IROS 2003). International Conference on. 2003; 3(4):3083 – 3088. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2003.1249630
11. Tholey G, Chanthasopeephan T, Hu T, Desai JP, Lau A. Measuring grasping and cutting forces for reality-based haptic modeling. International Congress Series. 2003. (1256):794–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5131(03)00492-8
12. Chanthasopeephan T, Desai JP, Lau AC. Modeling soft-tissue deformation prior to cutting for surgical simulation: finite element analysis and study of cutting parameters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(3):349-359. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TBME.2006.886937
13. Mahvash M, Hayward V. Haptic rendering of cutting: A fracture mechanics approach. Haptics-e. 2001;2(3):1-12. Avaliable in: http://hdl.handle.net/1773/34885
14. Ramachandra SS, Mehta DS, Sandesh N, Baliga V, Amarnath. J. Periodontal probing systems: a review of available equipment. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011;32(2):71-7. Avalaible in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21473303
15. Caton J, Greenstein G, Polson A. Depth of Periodontal Probe Penetration Related to Clinical and Histologic Signs of Gingival Inflammation. J Periodontol. 1981;52(10):626-9.
https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1981.52.10.626
16. Al Shayeb K, Turner W, Gillam D. Accuracy and reproducibility of probe forces during simulated periodontal pocket depth measurements. Saudi Dent J. 2014;26(2):50-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.02.001
17. Botero M, Quintero AC. Evaluación de los biotipos periodontales en la dentición. CES odontol. 2001;14(2):13-18. Available in: http://revistas.ces.edu.co/index.php/odontologia/ article/view/689/412
18. Kan J, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010; 30(3):237-43. Available in: http://jidai.ir/aticle-1-1890-en.html
19. Sa G, Xiong X, Wu T, Yang J, He S, Zhao Y. Histological features of oral epithelium in seven animal species: As a reference for selecting animal models. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016 Jan 1;81:10-7.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2015.09.019
20. S Cotin, Delingette H, Ayache, N. A HybridElastic Model allowing Real Time Cutting,
Deformations and Force-Feedback for Surgery Training and Simulation. Virtual Computer journal. 2000; 16 (8):437-452. Available in: https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00615105/document
21. Y Daigo, Masanori Y, Homa O, Yasunori Y, Kanji T. “A comparison between electrocautery and scalpel plus scissor in breast conserving surgery,” Oncol. Rep. 2003; 10:1729–1732. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.10.6.1729
22. H Cassandra, Jensen M. Histological methods for ex vivo axon tracing: A systematic review. Neurological Research. 2016; 38(7): 561-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2016.1153820
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.