¿Qué pasa con el wac? arqueología y “compromiso” en un mundo globalizado
PDF

Cómo citar

Shepherd, N., & Haber, A. (2011). ¿Qué pasa con el wac? arqueología y “compromiso” en un mundo globalizado. Jangwa Pana, 10(1), 66–95. https://doi.org/10.21676/16574923.65

Resumen

El año 2011 marca el vigésimo quinto  del Congreso Arqueológico  (WAC, por sus siglas en inglés).  WAC marcó una audaz intervención  la política del en el contexto de mediados de los años ochentas. Más, ¿cómo le fue en los mundos contemporáneos de la ? En este artículo, dos antiguos  del WAC adoptan una mirada  y crítica sobre las cambiantes , significados y contextos de.Centralmente, es un relato  controvertido encuentro entre el Ejecutivo  WAC y Rio Tinto minera, en Melbourne en 2007. Otras partes del artículo nociones de lo indígena, y discuten  supuestos que integran el programa del WAC Sin Fronteras”.  como un desafío, este artículo  respuestas y comentarios,  una de abrir un debate que  permita entrever futuros alternativos  la disciplina, más allá de la banal  de una “Arqueología Ltda.”

Palabras clave

Congreso mundial de la arqueologia; arqueologia pública; globalización World archaeological congress; public archaeology; globalization
https://doi.org/10.21676/16574923.65
PDF

Citas

Anon. (2004). Friends of the Earth International media briefing, 7 April 2004.

Anon. (2007). War Profiteer of the Month: Rio Tinto Alcan. War Resister’s International.

Anon. (2010). World Archaeological Congress. [accessed xxxxxx]. Available at:

< http://www.worldarchaeologicalcongress.org>

Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.

Castells, M. (2010). The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

Comaroff, J. L., Comaroff, J. (2009). Ethnicity Inc. Scottsville: University of -Natal.

Deacon, J. (1986). Editorial. South African Archaeological Bulletin 41:4.

Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of Difference: Place, movements, life, redes. Durham, : Duke University.

Giddens, A. (2009). The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity.

Haber, A. (2009a). Animism, Relatedness, Life: Post-Western perspectives.

Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19:418-30.

Haber, A. (2009b). Back to life: Archaeology and the decolonial turn. In Advanced

Seminar on Theory in Archaeology: South Africa/ Argentina Bilateral.

University of Cape Town.

Hall, M. (2002). Going Local? The World Archaeological Congress and Effective

Action. World Archaeological Bulletin 15:1-9.

Hall, M. & Bombardella, P. (2005). ‘Las Vegas In Africa’. Journal of Social Archaeology (1):5-25.

Hall, S. & du Gay, P., eds. (1996). Questions of Cultural Identity. London: SAGE.

Hall, S., Held, D. & McGrew, T., eds. (1992). Modernity and its Futures. Cambridge:

Polity.

Hamilakis, Y. (2003). Iraq, stewardship and ‘the record’: an ethical crisis for

archaeology. Public Archaeology 3:104-11.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire.

New York: Penguin.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/ Harvard.

Kitchen, W. (1998). From Croatia to Cape Town: the future of the World Archaeological

Congress. Antiquity 72:747-50.

Mignolo, W. (1999). Local Histories/ Global Designs: Coloniality, subaltern

knowledges and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

Mignolo, W. (2008). The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference.

In

M. Morana, E. Dussel & C. A. Jáuregui, eds. (2008). Coloniality at Large: Latin

America and the Postcolonial Debate. Durham: Duke University.

Moody, R. (1992). Plunder: The story of Rio Tinto-Zinc: Partizans.

Perlez, J. & Bonner, R. (2005). Freeport Rio Tinto: Gold’s other price. New York

Times.

RioTinto. (2005). Rio Tinto: The way we work. Melbourne.

RioTinto (2007a). Rio Tinto: Community relations guidance note, cultural heritage

management guidance. Melbourne.

RioTinto (2007b). Rio Tinto: Community relations standard. Melbourne.

RioTinto (2007c). Rio Tinto: Engagement through social and environmental

partnerships and relationships. From global to local. Melbourne.

RioTinto (2007d). Rio Tinto: Working in partnership. Melbourne.

R (2007e). Rio Tinto: Working with communities. Common objectives,

diverse cultures. Melbourne.

RioTinto (2007f). World Archaeological Congress and Rio Tinto Workshop: we “partner” on Heritage Management (Melbourne Business School,-2 October), Melbourne.

Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Shepherd, N. (2006). What Does it Mean to Give the Past Back to the People?

Archaeology and Ethics in the Post-colony. In Y. Hamilakis & P. Duke, eds.,

Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics. London: UCL.

S, N. (2007). Archaeology Dreaming; postapartheid urban imaginaries

and the bones of the Prestwich Street dead. Journal of Social Archaeology 7:3-

Shepherd, N. (2008a). At the Sharp Edge of the Trowel: Archaeology, social movements

and the politics of memory and identity. In Material Worlds Seminar.

Brown University.

Shepherd, N. (2008b). Heritage. In N. Shepherd & S. Robins, eds., New South

African Keywords. Cape Town and Athens, Ohio: Jacana Media and Ohio University.

Shepherd, N. (2010). Keynote Address: Archaeology, Coloniality, Modernity. In

CHAT 2010 (Contemporary and Historical Archaeology and Theory). Oxford

University.

Ucko, P. J. (1987). Academic freedom and apartheid: the story of the World Archaeological

Congress. London: Duckworth.

Vassilopoulos, J. (1997). Rio Tinto: the world’s worst company? Green Left Weekly

West, R. (1972). River of Tears: The story of Rio Tinto-Zinc Mining: Earth Island.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.