Indigenous archaeology as complement to, not separate from, scientific archaeology
PDF

Cómo citar

Watkins, J. (2011). Indigenous archaeology as complement to, not separate from, scientific archaeology. Jangwa Pana, 10(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.21676/16574923.64

Resumen

Defining Indigenous Archaeology is as difficult as defining “Indigenous”. In some areas the term “Indigenous” is applied to people who existed in an area prior to colonization (“Geography”); in other areas it is applied to people who are to those people whose ancestors created the culture being (“Descendancy”); in others it is applied to the community of people who live in the area where the archaeology is being conducted (“Proximity”). This paper recognizes that Archaeology, however defined, has characteristics that add to the scientific study of the human past; that Indigenous Archaeology is not meant to supplant scientific archaeology but to add to archaeology’s powers. In this paper I will provide an overview of Indigenous Archaeology, examine some of the in trying to discuss its many facets as a single disciplinary approach to the of the past, and then close with an examination of the in the generalized approach to the study of the past by partnering with communities and organizations.

Palabras clave

Arqueologia indigena; arqueologia cientifica; comunidades indigenas Indigenous archaeology; scientific archaeology; indigenous communities
https://doi.org/10.21676/16574923.64
PDF

Citas

Anderson C. (1985). On the Notion of Aboriginality: A Discussion. Mankind 15: 41-3

Archer J. (1991). Ambiguity in Political Ideology: Aboriginality as Nationalism. In Reconsidering Aboriginality, ed. S Thiele, pp. 161-70: Australian Journal of Anthropology

Asian Development Bank (2004). Definition of Indigenous People.

Coggins, C. (2003). Latin America, Native America, and the politics of culture. In Claiming the Stones, Naming the Bones: Cultural Property and the Negotiation of National and Ethnic Identity, ed. E Barkan, R Bush, pp. 97 115. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute

Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. (2009). Inheriting the Past: The Making of Arthur C. Parker and Indigenous Archaeology. University of Arizona Press

Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C; T.J. Ferguson, D. Lippert, R. McGuire, G.P. Nicholas, J.E. Watkins, and L.R. Zimmerman (2010) “The Premise and the Promise of Indigenous Archaeology.” American Antiquity 75(2):228-238

Davidson I. (1991). Archaeologists and Aborigines. In Reconsidering Aboriginality, ed. S Thiele, pp. 247-58: Australian Journal of Anthropology

Dyck, N. (1992). Indigenous peoples and the nation-state: ‘Fourth World’ politics in Canada, Australia, and Norway. Social and Economic Papers 14. Memorial University Newfoundland: Institute for Social and Economic Research

Endere ML. (2002). The reburial issue in Argentina: a growing conflict. In The Dead and their Possessions: Repatriation in principle, policy and practice, ed. C Fforde, Jane Hubert and Paul Turnbull, pp. 266-83. London: Routledge Press

Ferguson, T.J. and C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh (2006). History Is in the Land: Multivocal Tribal Traditions in Arizona’s San Pedro Valley, Tucson: University of Arizona Press

Guevara, Á.L.R. (2003). Archaeology and Indigenous Communities of Northern Chile. Chungará (Arica) 35:337-346

Haber A. 2005. Archaeology at both sides of the iron bars. Archaeologies 1:111-118

International Labour Organization (1989). C169 Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989. http://www.ilo.org/indigenous/Resources/Publications/

lang--es/docName--WCMS_100910/index.htm

Kerber, J., editor. (2006). Cross-Cultural Collaboration: Native Americans and Archaeology in the Northeastern United States. University of Nebraska Press

Kojan, D. (2008). Paths of Power and Politics: Historical Narratives at the Bolivian Site of Tiwanaku. In Evaluating Multiple Narratives: Beyond Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist Archaeologies, ed. J. Habu, C. Fawcett, and J.M. Matsunaga,

pp. 69-85. New York: Springer

Lewins F. (1991). Theoretical and political implications of the dynamic approach to Aboriginality. In Reconsidering Aboriginality, ed. S Thiele, pp. 171 78: Australian Journal of Anthropology

McGhee, R. (2008). Aboriginalism and the Problems of Indigenous Archaeology. American Antiquity 73:579-597.

McGhee, R. (2010). Of Strawmen, Herrings, and Frustrated Expectations. American Antiquity 75(2):239-243

Nicholas, G.P. (2008). Native Peoples and Archaeology. In: Encyclopedia of Archaeology, ed. by Deborah M. Pearsall, pp. 1660-1669. Academic Press, New York

Rodríguez U, Alfaro L. 2003. Archaeology, cultural heritage, and native populations: reflections from the Atacama Desert. Chungará (Arica) 35:295 304

Roughly A. (1991). Racism, Aboriginality, and textuality: toward a deconstructing discourse. See Thiele 1991, pp. 202 12: Australian Journal of Anthropology

Sackett L. (1991). Promoting primitivism: conservationist depictions of Aboriginal Australians. See Thiele 1991, pp. 233 46: Australian Journal of Anthropology

Silliman, S. W., editor. (2008). Collaborating at the Trowel’s Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology. American Studies in Archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press

Silliman, S. W. (2010). The Value and Diversity of Indigenous Archaeology: a Response to McGhee. American Antiquity 75(2):217-220

Sylvain R. (2002). Land, water, and truth: San identity and global Indigenism. American Anthropologist 104:1074 85

Thiele S, ed. (1991). Reconsidering Aboriginality. Aust. J. Anthropol. 2(2): Spec. issue

Watkins, J. (2000). Indigenous Archaeology: American Indian Values and Scientific Practice. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira. 218 pp.

Watkins, J. (2005). “Through Wary Eyes: Indigenous Perspectives on Archaeology”. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 429-449

Wilcox, M (2010). Saving Indigenous Peoples from Ourselves: Separate but Equal Archaeology is not Scientific Archaeology. American Antiquity 75(2):221-227. WHO Ethics and Health (s.f.). In: http://www.who.int/ethics/indigenous_peoples/

en/index.html

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.