Keywords
Success
Failure
Mini-screws
Factors
How to Cite
Abstract
With conventional orthodontic biomechanics, the results are not always obtained in the required time, especially in complex cases, for which mini-implants are used to solve these difficulties. Identifying and describing the factors that affect the success and/or failure of mini-dental implants in orthodontics is the objective of this exploratory systematic review. The databases were used: PubMed, Google Schoolar, Science Direct and Clinical key. Articles in English and/or Spanish, randomized controlled trials, prospective clinical trials and retrospective clinical studies were analyzed. The initial searches identified 612 titles and abstracts on mini-implants of which 480 were excluded, the remaining 132 articles were retrieved and analyzed, 22 met the selection criteria, finally only N=6 articles met for data analysis. All the studies identified were those of the self-drilling system, with immediate loading in the upper jaw, all the mini-implants were made of titanium and from different commercial manufacturers. The material, manufacturer and diameter of the mini-implants do not affect the success rates, the proximity of a root is not associated with the failure of the mini-implant and it is considered a failure of the mini-implant if it presented any postoperative mobility.References
Chen Y, Kyung HM, Zhao WT, Yu WJ. Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(3):284-291. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.017
Jara L, Camelo NM, Alvarez DJ, Cascavita C, Forero M. Resultados de movimientos ortodóncicos con mini-implantes en tratamientos de ortodoncia. Journal odont col. 2012;5(9). Disponible en: https://revistas.unicoc.edu.co/index.php/joc/article/view/206
Gansukh O, Jeong JW, Kim JW, Lee JH, Kim TW. Mechanical and Histological Effects of Resorbable Blasting Media Surface Treatment on the Initial Stability of Orthodontic Mini-Implants. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7520959. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7520959
Gutiérrez P, Hernández R, Perea García A, Escudero N, Bascones A. Microtornillos: Una revisión. Av en Period. 2014; 26(1): 25-38. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1699-65852014000100004&lng=es.
Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants with different surface characteristics subjected to static load. A study in the dog (II). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(3):196-201. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003196.x.
Wu TY, Kuang SH, Wu CH. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(8):1595-1599. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.015
Blanco López P, Monsalve Guil L, Matos Garrido N, Moreno Muñoz J, Nuñez Márquez E, Velasco Ortega E. La oseointegración de implantes de titanio con diferentes superficies rugosas. Av Odontoestomatol. 2018;34(3):141-149. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852018000300005&lng=es.
Irigoin P. Diferentes dispositivos de anclaje temporario esqueletal (TADS) Microimplantes y miniplacas. Sus diferentes usos clínicos. Sociedad Argentina de Ortodoncia. Argentina: Editorial Universidad Católica Argentina. 2010. Disponible en: https://www.ortodoncia.org.ar/_files/ugd/42b798_39db23f4db3844b3b806f9c3495ba95a.pdf
Rodríguez Y, Pérez García M, León O, Reytor E, Sánchez T. Resultados del uso de mini-implantes como anclaje para el movimiento de intrusión molar en Ortodoncia. Gac Méd Espirit. 2021; 23(1):12-23. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=104215
Buschang PH, Carrillo R, Ozenbaugh B, Rossouw PE. 2008 survey of AAO members on miniscrew usage. J Clin Orthod. 2008;42(9):513-518. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18974458/
Vélez Martínez D, Martínez González JL, Díaz Cepeda LF, Osorio Patiño JC, Martínez Cajas CH. Evaluación tomográfica de mini-implantes ortodónticos (MIO) en la región infracigomática. Journal odont col. 2019;12(24):8-18. Disponible en: https://revistas.unicoc.edu.co/index.php/joc/article/view/392
González-Valls G, Roca-Millan E, Céspedes-Sánchez JM, González-Navarro B, Torrejon-Moya A, López-López J. Narrow Diameter Dental Implants as an Alternative Treatment for Atrophic Alveolar Ridges. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(12):3234. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123234
Alrabiah M. Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10(1):e12367. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12367
Al-Shibani N, Al-Aali K, Al-Hamdan , Alrabiah M, Basunbul G, Abduljabbar T. Comparison of clinical peri-implant indices and crestal bone levels around narrow and regular diameter implants placed in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: A 3-year follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat. 2019;21:247–252. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12712
de Souza AB, Sukekava F, Tolentino L, César-Neto JB, Garcez-Filho J, Araújo MG. Narrow- and regular-diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(1):100-107. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13076
Moráguez O, Vailati F, Grütter L, Sailer I, Belser U. Four-unit fixed dental prostheses replacing the maxillary incisors supported by two narrow-diameter implants—A five-year case series. Clin. Oral Implant. 2017;28:887–892. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12895.
Shirck JM, Firestone AR, Beck FM, Vig KW, Huja SS. Temporary anchorage device utilization: comparison of usage in orthodontic programs and private practice. Orthodontics (Chic.). 2011;12(3):222-231. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22022693/
Markic G, Katsaros C, Pandis N, Eliades T. Temporary anchorage device usage: a survey among Swiss orthodontists. Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0029-x
Turpin DL. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(6):681-686. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.010
Feldmann I, Bondemark L. Orthodontic anchorage: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(3):493-501. Doi: https://doi.org/:10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0493:OA]2.0.CO;2
Haddad R, Saadeh M. Distance to alveolar crestal bone: a critical factor in the success of orthodontic mini-implants. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):19. Published 2019 May 13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0273-1
Geshay D, Campbell P, Tadlock L, Schneiderman E, Kyung HM, Buschang P. Stability of immediately loaded 3 mm long miniscrew implants: a feasibility study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2021;26(1):e2119155. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.1.e2119155.oar
Park JH, Chae JM, Bay RC, Kim MJ, Lee KY, Chang NY. Evaluation of factors influencing the success rate of orthodontic microimplants using panoramic radiographs. Korean J Orthod. 2018;48(1):30-38. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.1.30
Hourfar J, Bister D, Kanavakis G, Lisson JA, Ludwig B. Influence of interradicular and palatal placement of orthodontic mini-implants on the success (survival) rate. Head Face Med. 2017;13(1):14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-017-0147-z
Torres L, Cruz R, Malcom M, Torres U. Evaluación de microimplantes como unidad de anclaje en movimientos ortodóncicos. Org Cient Est Cien Médica Cub. 2017;56(266):149-156. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/abril/abr-2017/abr17266d.pdf
Gurdan Z, Szalma J. Evaluation of the success and complication rates of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(5):546-552. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_105_17
Vilani GN, Ruellas AC, Elias CN, Mattos CT. Stability of smooth and rough mini-implants: clinical and biomechanical evaluation - an in vivostudy. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20(5):35-42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.035-042.oar
Suzuki EY, Suzuki B. Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(5):669-678. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.11.017
Reynders RM, Ronchi L, Ladu L, van Etten-Jamaludin F, Bipat S. Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142(5):596-614.e5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.013
Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Lee JW, Kim SH, Kim TW. Survival analysis of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(2):194-199. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.031
Greenstein G, Cavallaro J. Implant Insertion Torque: Its Role in Achieving Primary Stability of Restorable Dental Implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017;38(2):88-96. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28156122/
Di Stefano DA, Arosio P, Capparè P, Barbon S, Gherlone EF. Stability of Dental Implants and Thickness of Cortical Bone: Clinical Research and Future Perspectives. A Systematic Review. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(23):7183. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237183
Raikar S, Talukdar P, Kumari S, Panda S, Oommen M, Prasad A. Factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants: A retrospective study. J. Int. Soc. Prev Community Dent. 2017;7:351–355. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_380_17.
Lee DW, Park JH, Bay RC, Choi SK, Chae JM. Cortical bone thickness and bone density effects on miniscrew success rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24 Suppl 1:92-102. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12453
Albogha MH, Kitahara T, Todo M, Hyakutake H, Takahashi I. Predisposing Factors for Orthodontic Mini-Implant Failure Defined by Bone Strains in Patient-Specific Finite Element Models. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(10):2948-2956. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1584-8
Albogha MH, Kitahara T, Todo M, Hyakutake H, Takahashi I. Maximum principal strain as a criterion for prediction of orthodontic mini-implants failure in subject-specific finite element models. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(1):24-31. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/120514-875.1
Ugarte OM, Gialain IO, de Carvalho NM, et al. Can maxilla and mandible bone quality explain differences in orthodontic mini-implant failures?. Biomater Investig Dent. 2021;8(1):1-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1863155
Gintautaitė G, Gaidytė A. Surgery-related factors affecting the stability of orthodontic mini implants screwed in alveolar process interdental spaces: a systematic literature review. Stomatologija. 2017;19(1):10-18. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29243679/
Reynders RM, Isaia L. Failure rates of palatal implants or mini-screws for orthodontic anchorage. Evid Based Dent. 2019;20(1):9-11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-019-0010-0
Reynders RM, Cacciatore G. No confidence that success rates of self-drilling and self-tapping insertion techniques of orthodontic mini-implants are similar. Evid Based Dent. 2016;17(4):111-113. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401203
Reynders RM, Ladu L, Ronchi L, et al. Insertion torque recordings for the diagnosis of contact between orthodontic mini-implants and dental roots: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2016;5:50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0227-3
Alharbi F, Almuzian M, Bearn D. Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40(5):519-530. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx093
Uesugi S, Kokai S, Kanno Z, Ono T. Prognosis of primary and secondary insertions of orthodontic miniscrews: What we have learned from 500 implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;152(2):224-231. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.021
Barros SE, Vanz V, Chiqueto K, Janson G, Ferreira E. Mechanical strength of stainless steel and titanium alloy mini-implants with different diameters: an experimental laboratory study. Prog Orthod. 2021;22(1):9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00352-w
Scribante A, Montasser MA, Radwan ES, Bernardinelli L, Alcozer R, Gandini P, et al. Reliability of orthodontic Miniscrews: bending and maximum load of different Ti-6Al-4V titanium and stainless steel temporary Anchorage devices (TADs) Materials (Basel). 2018;11:1138. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11071138.
Ramírez-Ossa DM, Escobar-Correa N, Ramírez-Bustamante MA, Agudelo-Suárez AA. An Umbrella Review of the Effectiveness of Temporary Anchorage Devices and the Factors That Contribute to Their Success or Failure. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020;20(2):101402. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101402
Leo M, Cerroni L, Pasquantonio G, Condò SG, Condò R. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in orthodontics: review of the factors that influence the clinical success rate of the mini-implants. Clin Ter. 2016;167(3):e70-e77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2016.1936
Kakali L, Alharbi M, Pandis N, Gkantidis N, Kloukos D. Success of palatal implants or mini-screws placed median or paramedian for the reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41(1):9-20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy015
Mohammed H, Wafaie K, Rizk MZ, Almuzian M, Sosly R, Bearn DR. Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2018;19(1):36. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0225-1
Alharbi F, Almuzian M, Bearn D. Anchorage effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrews compared to headgear and transpalatal arches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77(2):88-98. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1508742
Yi J, Ge M, Li M, Li C, Li Y, Li X, et al. Comparison of the success rate between self-drilling and self-tapping miniscrews: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39(3):287-293. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw036
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Universidad del Magdalena