¿Se puede educar el criterio sobre el juicio moral? Una perspectiva crítica al intuicionismo social y al racionalismo kolhberiano
Resumen
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Intuicionismo social
racionalismo moral
juicio moral
teoría de las decisiones

How to Cite

Fabio, & Salazar Morales, J. . (2023). ¿Se puede educar el criterio sobre el juicio moral? Una perspectiva crítica al intuicionismo social y al racionalismo kolhberiano. Praxis, 19(1), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.3491

Abstract

The reason-emotion dualism infers that there are two spheres for ethical evaluation: a rational one of logical thinking with which weighted moral decisions are made and, on the other hand, and in the same person, a non-rational, emotional way, which responds to automatically to stimuli and impressions. Jonathan Haidt (2001) trying to save this bivalent gap, proposed as a solution his approach to social intuitionism that amalgamates both the emotional-intuitive position for the construction of moral judgment, and anthropological, social and cultural elements that form the definitive criterion of the person to face moral dilemmas. On the other hand, Lawrence Kohlberg (1955) considers that moral judgment is constructed gradually and progressively from education rationally. In this work, both Haidt's theory and Kolhberg's theory are criticized, as it is considered to generate a reductionist and, at times, exclusionary dichotomy between the rational processes formative of morality and impressions generated by emotions. It is concluded that it is possible to educate the criterion for moral judgment because, in essence, there is no exclusionary dichotomy between intuition and reasoning, and that, on the other hand, they complement each other.
https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.3491
PDF (Español (España))

References

Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge University Press.

Bartels, D. (2008). Principled Moral Sentiment and The Flexibility of Moral Judgment and Decision Making. Cognition, 108, 381-417.

Bartels, D., Bauman, C., Cushman, F., Pizarro, D. y McGraw, P. (2015). Moral Judgment and Decision Making. En G. Keren y G. Wu (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 1-51).

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, A. y Damasio, A. (1997). Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy. Science, 275, 1293-1295.

Bolaño García, M. (2021). La educación en perspectiva humanizadora mediante su articulación con las tecnologías. Praxis, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.4657.

Buganza, J. (2018). Estudio introductorio a Sobre la naturaleza del derecho y su relación con el deber de Antonio Rosmini. Revista de Filosofía Open Insight, 9(16), 231-246.

Castro Robles, Y. A. (2020). Agravios morales y luchas por el reconocimiento: reflexiones en el contexto educativo. Praxis, 16(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.3455.

Chang, R. (2009). Voluntarist reasons and the sources of normativity. En D. Sobel y S. Wall (Eds.), Reasons for Action (pp. 243-271). Cambridge University Press.

Churchland, P. (2011). El cerebro moral. Lo que la neurociencia nos cuenta sobre la moralidad. Paidós.

Cushman, F., Young, L. y Greene, J. (2010). Multisystem Moral Psychology. En J. Doris y The Moral Psychology of Moral Group (Eds.), The Moral Psychology Handbook (pp. 47-61). Oxford University Press.

Damasio, A. (1999). El error de Descartes. La razón de las emociones. Andrés Bello.

Damasio, A. (2000). Sentir lo que sucede: cuerpo y emoción en la fábrica de la consciencia. Andrés Bello.

Damasio, A. (2007). En busca de Spinoza. Neurobiología de la emoción y los sentimientos. Crítica.

Damasio, A. (2012). Y el cerebro creó al hombre. Destino.

Descartes, R. (2004). Discurso del método. Colihue.

Evans, J. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.

Evans, J. y Stanovich, K. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241.

Feldman-Barret, L. (2018). La vida secreta del cerebro, cómo se construyen las emociones. Paidós.

Freud, S. (1999). Sobre las teorías sexuales infantiles. Obras completas, 9, 183-201.

Galeno. (1997). Sobre la localización de las enfermedades. Gredos.

Greene, J. D. y Haidt, J. (2002). How (and Where) does Moral Judgment Work? Cognitive Science, 6, 517-523.

Greene, J., Nystrom, L., Engell, A., Darley, J. y Cohen, J. (2004). The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment. Neuron, 44, 389-400.

Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834.

Haidt, J. (2003). The Moral Emotions. En R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer y H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852-870). Oxford University Press.

Haidt, J. y Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive Ethics: How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55-66.

Haidt, J. y Joseph, C. (2008). The Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules. En P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, y S. Stich (Eds.), The Innate Mind (volume 3). Foundations and the Future. Evolution and Cognition (pp. 367-391). Oxford University Press.

Haidt, J. y Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. En S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert y G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 797-832).

Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F. y Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. Lund Psychological Reports, (1)2.

Haidt, J., Koller, S. H. y Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613.

Hervada, J. (2011). Introducción crítica al derecho natural. Eunsa.

Jung, C. (2016). Ensayo de exposición de la teoría psicoanalítica. Trotta.

Kahneman, D. (2012). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Random House.

Kant, I. (1788/2006). Crítica de la razón práctica. Sígueme.

Kant, I. (1785/2017). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Tecnos.

Kohlberg, L. (1958). Essays on Moral Development, Vol. I: The Philosophy of Moral Development. Harper & Row.

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. En D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Rand McNally.

Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. En T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151-235). Academic Press.

Lieberman, D., Tooby, J. y Cosmides, L. (2003). Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 270(1517), 819-826.

MacKay, D. (1982). Ourselves and our brains: Duality without dualism. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 7(4), 285-294.

Michaud, S. G. y Aynesworth, H. (2000). Ted Bundy: Conversations with a killer. Barnes & Noble.

Mikhail, J. (2011). Elements of Moral Cognition. Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy. Cambridge University Press.

Mikhail, J. M., Sorrentino, C. y Spelke, E. (2002). Aspects of the theory of moral cognition: Investigating intuitive knowledge of the prohibition of intentional battery, the rescue principle, the first principle of practical reason, and the principle of double effect (Manuscrito inédito). Stanford University.

Morandín-Ahuerma, F., Romero-Fernández, A., Villanueva-Méndez, L., & Santos-Cabañas, E. (2023). Hacia una fundamentación ético-normativa del sujeto de derecho. Revista Jurídica Crítica y Derecho, 4(6), 1-12. https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/criticayderecho/article/view/4242

Moreno Guerrero, A. J., López Belmonte, J., & Fuentes Cabrera, A. (2018). Influencia del género y la religión en el uso del recurso Wiki. Un estudio de casos. Praxis, 14(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.2671

Nino, C. S. (1989). Ética y derechos humanos: un ensayo de fundamentación. Astrea.

ONU. (1949). Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos. Resolución 217 A III.

Platón. (1992). Fedro. Gredos.

Pratesi, A. (2018). Macro-Structural Relevance of Emotions. En A. Pratesi, Doing Care, Doing Citizenship (63-90). Springer Nature.

Prinz, J. (2006). The Emotional Basis of Moral Judgment. Philosophical Explanation, 9(1), 29-43.

Rawls, J. (2012). Teoría de la Justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Salles, A. (2010). Sobre el asco en la moralidad. Diánoia, 55(64), 27-45.

Skinner, B. (2009). About behaviorism. Random House.

Vivas, M., Gallego, D. J. y González, B. (2007). Educar las emociones. Dykinson.

Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175.

Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224-228.

Zuluaga Giraldo, J. I., & Largo Taborda, W. A. (2020). Educación propia como rescate de la autonomía y la identidad cultural. Praxis, 16(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.3657.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Praxis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.