Centennials, global and digital citizens
PDF (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))

Keywords

Digital Citizenship; Global Citizenship; Moral Foundations; Social Networks; Centennials.

How to Cite

Jasso-Peña, F. de J., Gudiño-Paredes, S., & Tamez-Solis, J. P. (2019). Centennials, global and digital citizens. Praxis, 15(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.2981

Abstract

The study sought to learn how centennials communicate the moral and socio-political aspects of their global and digital citizenship. A mixed-exploratory approach with a sequential design was selected for this study. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected in different stages of the research, although they were not dependent on one another. For the quantitative section, which is directly related to the first category intended for research, the population consisted of students from the national high school system, a public high school, and two private high schools located in Nuevo León, Mexico. Convenience sampling was used to determine the population, based on available computer access in the classroom. The final number of participants was 1 696 students, 899 of which were women and 797 were men. It was found that said participants openly communicated their socio-political stance on social networks, and they also value justice and reciprocity more when making moral decisions. For this reason, it is important to raise them so that they can participate actively and properly in a context of global communication.
https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.2981
PDF (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))

References

Abrego, L. J. (2011). Legal consciousness of undocumented latinos: Fear and stigma as barriers to claims-making for first- and 1.5- generation immigrants. Law & Society Review, 45(2), 337-370. Doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00435.x

Amichai Hamburger, Y., Bronstein, J., Gazit, T., Pérez, O., Bar-llan, J. y Aharony, N. (2016). An examination of the factors contributing to participation in online social plataforms. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(6), 793-818. Doi: 10.1108/AJIM-05-2016-0059

Anderson, M. y Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media and technology 2018. Pew Research Center. Recuperado de www.pewresearch.org

Bell, D. (1976). El advenimiento de la sociedad post-industrial: Un intento de prognosis social. Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.

Boni Aristizábal, A., Hofmann-Pinilla, A. y Sow Paino, J. (2012). Educando para la ciudadanía global. Una experiencia de investigación cooperativa entre docentes y profesionales de las ONG. Estudios sobre Educación, 23, 63-81. Recuperado de https://www.unav.edu/publicaciones/revistas/index.php/estudios-sobre-educacion/article/view/2049

Bromley, P., Lerch, J. y Jiménez, J. (2016). Education for global citizenship education & sustainable development: Content in social science textbooks. Global Education Monitoring Report-UNESCO. Recuperado de http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002456/245614e.pdf

Bucio García, J. (2017). “Hablar por escrito”, nuevas habilidades de comunicación en la digitalidad. Revista Digital Universitaria, 18(3). Recuperado de http://www.revista.unam.mx/vol.18/num3/art25/

Buente, W. (2015). Relating digital citizenship to informed citizenship online in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Information Polity, 20(4), 269-285. Doi: 10.3233/IP-150375

Cacciatore, M. A., Yeo, S. K., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., Brossard, D. y Corley, E. A. (2018). Is Facebook making us dumber? Exploring social media use as a predictor of political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 404-424. Doi: 10.1177/1077699018770447

Calabrese, F. A. (2010). Evolution of twenty‐first century knowledge workers. On the Horizon, 18(3), 160-170. Doi: 10.1108/10748121011072618

Carr, N. (2011). Superficiales: ¿Qué está haciendo internet con nuestras mentes? Madrid, España: Taurus.

Chicioreanu, T. y Amza, C. (2018). Adapting your teaching to accommodate the Net Generation /Z-Generation of learners. Elearning & Software for Education, 3, 13-20. Doi: 10.12753/2066-026X-18-143

Claret Campana, M. (2015). Los Millennials egipcios y la “primavera árabe”. Movilización social y frustración. Revista de Estudios Internacionales Mediterráneos, (18), 1-43. Recuperado de https://revistas.uam.es/index.php/reim/article/view/1965

Coletto, M., Esul, A., Lucchese, C., Muntean, C., Nardini, F. M., Perego, R. y Renso, Ch. (2017). Perception of social phenomena through the multidimensional analysis of online social networks. Online Social Networks and Media, 1, 14-32. Doi: 10.1016/j.osnem.2017.03.001

Creswell, J. W. y Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Estados Unidos: Sage.

Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. Nueva York: Prometheus.

Dewey, J. (1909). Moral Principles in Education. Recuperado de https://archive.org/details/moralprinciplesi01dewe/page/n4

Eis, A. y Moulin-Doos, C. (2017). Cosmopolitan citizenship education: Realistic political program or program to disillusioned powerlessness? A plea for a critical power perspective within global citizenship education. Journal of Social Science Education, 16(4), 49-59. Doi: 10.4119/UNIBI/jsse-v16-i4-1639

Giroux, S. y Treblay, G. (2004). Metodología de las ciencias humanas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Goodiera, S., Field, C. y Goodman, S. (2018). The need for theory evaluation in global citizenship programmes: The case of the GCSA programme. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 7-19. Doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.08.011

Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S. y Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366-85. Doi: 10.1037/a0021847

Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 65-72. Doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x

Haidt, J. y Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55-66. Doi: 10.1162/0011526042365555

Hargreaves, A. (2005). Profesorado, cultura y postmodernidad. España: Morata.

Hernández, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª edición). México: McGraw-Hill.

Hoffman, L. H. y Schechter, A. L. (2016). Technical skills required: How technological efficacy influences online political behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(3), 484-502. Doi: 10.1080/08838151.2016.1203321

Jones, L. M. y Mitchell, K. J. (2015). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New Media & Society, 18(9), 2063-2079. Doi: 10.1177/1461444815577797

Knoester, M. y Kretz, L. (2017). Why do young adults vote at low rates? Implications for education. Social Studies Research and Practice, 12(2), 139-153. Doi: 10.1108/SSRP-04-2017-0013

Kohlberg, L. (1992). Psicología del desarrollo moral. Recuperado de http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=318583

Kruikemeier, S. (2014). How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 131-139. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025

Krusea, L. M., Norrisa, D. R. y Flinchumb, J. R. (2018). Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. The Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62-84. Doi: 10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143

Lane, R. E. (1966). The decline of politics and ideology in a knowledgeable society. American Sociological Review, 31(5), 649-662. Doi: 10.2307/2091856

Lim, Y. y Lee Won, R. L. (2016). When retweets persuade: The persuasive effects of dialogic retweeting and the role of social presence in organizations’ Twitter-based communication. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 422-433. Doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.003

Loveland, E. (2017). Instant generation. Journal of College Admission, (234), 34-38. ERIC: EJ1142068

McClennen, S. A. (2018). What’s wrong with slactivism? Confronting the neoliberal assault on millennials. Workplace, 30, 298-311. Recuperado de http://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/workplace/article/view/186396/185473

McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T. Smith, M. y Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165-193. Doi: 10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320

Molina, S. y Lattimer, H. (2013). Defining global education. Policy Futures in Education, 11(4), 414-422. Doi: 10.2304/pfie.2013.11.4.414

Muñoz Dagua, C. y Andrade Calderón, M. C. (2016). Voces en la red: Los estudiantes universitarios y el tuit. Tabula Rasa, (25), 429-443. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/tara/n25/1794-2489-tara-25-00429.pdf

Muñoz Expósito, M., Oviedo García, M. A. y Castellanos Verdugo, M. (2017). How to measure engagement in Twitter: advancing a metric. Internet Research, 27(5), 1122-1148. Doi: 10.1108/IntR-06-2016-0170

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. y Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Reino Unido: Reuters Institute & University of Oxford.

Nussbaum, M. (2002). Education for citizenship in an era of global connection. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21, 289-303. Doi: 10.1023/A:1019837105053

Öztürk, N. y Ayvaz, S. (2018). Sentiment analysis on twitter: A text mining approach to the Syrian refugee crisis. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 136-147. Doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.006

Pal, J. y Gonawela, A. (2017). Studying political communication on Twitter: The case for small data. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 97-102. Doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.009

Pérez Béjar, V. (2014). Identidad individual y grupal en Twitter. Discurso & Sociedad, 8(3), 482-506. Recuperado de http://www.dissoc.org/ediciones/v08n03/DS8(3)Perez.pdf

Piaget, J. (1985). El criterio moral en el niño. México: Martínez Roca.

Polistina, K. (2018). Are neoliberalist behaviours reflective of bullying? New perspectives on influences on sustainability and global citizenship. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(1), 175-196. Doi: 10.1007/s10668-016-9876-6

Queiroz, D. T., Vall, J., Souza, A. M. A. y Vieira, N. F. C. (2007). Observação participante na pesquisa qualitativa: conceitos e aplicações na área da saúde. Revista Enfermagem UERJ, 15(2), 276-83. Recuperado de http://www.facenf.uerj.br/v15n2/v15n2a19.pdf

Reysen, S. y Hackett, J. (2017). Activism as a pathway to global citizenship. The Social Science Journal, 54(2), 132-138. Doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2016.09.003

Reysen, S. y Katzarska-Miller, I. (2017). Media, family, and friends: Normative environment and global citizenship identification. Journal of International & Global Studies, 9(1), 38-55.

Rybalko, S. y Seltzer, T. (2010). Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter. Public Relations Review, 36(4), 336-341. Doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.08.004

Sanja, I. (2016). Citizenship as discursive practice: The postmodern culture of citizenship. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Religion, 19, 13-19. Recuperado de http://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JPCR/article/view/30702

Saura, G., Muñoz Moreno, J. L., Luengo Navas, J. y Martos, J. M. (2016). Protesting on Twitter: Citizenship and empowerment from public education. Comunicar, 53(25), 39-48. Doi: 10.3916/C53-2017-04

Shatto, B. y Erwin, K. (2016). Moving on from millennials: Preparing for Generation Z. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(6), 253-254. Doi: 10.3928/00220124-20160518-05

Shearer, E. y Gottfried, J. (2017). News use across social media plataforms 2017. Pew Research Center. Recuperado de www.pewresearch.org

Siemons, R., Raymond-Flesh, M., Auerswald, C. L. y Brindis, C. D. (2017). Coming of age on the margins: Mental health and wellbeing among Latino immigrant young adults eligible for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Journal of immigrant and minority health, 19(3), 543-551. Doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0354-x

Sklad, M., Friedman, J., Park, E. y Oomen, B. (2016). ‘Going glocal’: A qualitative and quantitative analysis of global citizenship education at a Dutch Liberal Arts and Sciences College. Higher Education, 72, 323-340. Doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9959-6

Tashakkori, A. y Teddlie, C. (2010). Mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Estados Unidos: Sage.

UNESCO. (2014). Global citizenship education: preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century. Francia: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Recuperado de http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002277/227729e.pdf

VanderDussen Toukan, E. (2018). Educating citizens of ‘the global’: Mapping textual constructs of UNESCO’s global citizenship education 2012–2015. Education, Citizenship & Social Justice, 13(1), 51-64. Doi: 10.1177/1746197917700909

Veugelers, W. (2011). The moral and the political in global citizenship: Appreciating differences in education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9, 473-485. Doi: 10.1080/14767724.2011.605329

Yaqub, U., Chun, S. A., Atluri, V. y Vaidya, J. (2017). Analysis of political discourse on twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 613-626. Doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5.a edición). Los Angeles: Sage.

Zerpa, C. (2007). Tres teorías del desarrollo del juicio moral: Kohberg, Rest, Lind. Implicaciones para la formación moral. Laurus, 13(023), 137-157.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.