A reflection on a didactical design for training teachers in the incorporation of technology into the English Classroom

Cómo citar

Camacho Vásquez, G., Díaz Pareja, E. M. ., & Ortega Tudela, J. M. . (2023). A reflection on a didactical design for training teachers in the incorporation of technology into the English Classroom. Praxis, 19(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.4979


During the pandemic, emergency remote teaching (ERT) has shown the urgent need to train teachers in integrating technology in the classroom. This need becomes a requirement in English language teaching because using digital tools enables the development of cultural and intercultural competence. The literature review demonstrates that there are models that guide the integration of information technologies (ICT) in education in general. Still, a didactic design with procedures to train English teachers was not found. This article aims to describe and theoretically support a Web-based Didactic Design to train English teachers in using ICT in ELT. The Design is part of the Development and Implementation phases of a study that seeks to establish its effects on Teacher Digital Competence using the DigCompEdu framework. The construction of the Didactic Design is based on the Theory of Research through Design and the ADDIE Model of Instructional Design. The literature review establishes guidelines for formulating the Design and the limitations to be considered.

Palabras clave

ICT; ELT Didactics; Didactical Design; Innovation; Teachers’ Professional Development


Acar, O. A. & Tuncdogan, A. (2018). Using the inquiry-based learning approach to enhance student innovativeness: a conceptual model. Teaching in Higher Education. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1516636

Ansarian, L. & Teoh, M. (2018). Problem-based Language Learning and Teaching: An Innovative Approach to Learn a New Language. Singapore: Springer. https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=UfxlDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Problem-based+Language+Learning+and+Teaching:+An+Innovative+Approach+to+Learn+a+New+Language.&ots=WRs47lnYZb&sig=fwBx9khAyvShqNEhGufTvHOhTcY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Problem-based%20Language%20Learning%20and%20Teaching%3A%20An%20Innovative%20Approach%20to%20Learn%20a%20New%20Language.&f=false

Arías, J., Martín, R., Gutiérrez-Esteban, P., Delicado, G., Cubo, S., Alonso-Díaz, L. & Yuste, R. (2019). Synchronous Virtual Classrooms in Problem-Based Learning to Mentor and Monitor Students in Higher Education. In Universities in the Networked Society (pp. 133-154). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-05026-9_8

Badiou, A. (2007). The Event in Deleuze. Parrhesia. A Journal of Critical Philosophy. No. 2. http://parrhesiajournal.org/parrhesia02/parrhesia02_badiou02.pdf

Balboni, P. (2006). Intercultural Communicative Competence: A Model. Documents in Language Teaching Methodology. Perugia: Guerra Edizioni.

Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P. & Major, C. H. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.

Behar, P. (2011). Constructing Pedagogical Models For E-learning. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 4(3), 16–22. Kassel University Press GmbH. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/45571/.

Blake, R. J. (2018). La ELAO en el marco del enfoque por tareas. CÍRCULO de Linguística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 76, 67. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CLAC/article/view/62498/4564456548718

Borgdorff, H. (2006). The debate on research in the arts. Available at: www.ips.gu.se/digitalAssets/1322/1322713_the_debate_on_research_in_the_arts.pdf. 3, 4

Branch R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The Addie approach. Springer.

Byram, M., Gribkova, B. & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: A practical introduction for teachers. Language Policy Division, Directorate of School, Out-of-School and Higher Education, Council of Europe.

Cabero-Almenara, J. y Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2020). Marco Europeo de Competencia Digital Docente «DigCompEdu». Traducción y adaptación del cuestionario «DigCompEdu Check-In». Edmetic, 9(1), 213-234. https://www.uco.es/ucopress/ojs/index.php/edmetic/article/view/12462/11154

Camacho, G. (2017). La lógica del sentido incorporada a la noción de investigación como una orientación para el aprendizaje: dos experiencias en el aula. GIST–Education and Learning Research Journal, (14), 88-106. https://latinjournal.org/index.php/gist/article/view/406/350

Camacho-Vásquez, G., Díaz E. & Ortega J. (2023). Pedagogical Models in Teachers’ Education on the Use of Technology for English Teaching: A Systematic Review. Revista Zona Próxima Universidad del Norte. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Cong-Lem, N. (2018). Web-based language learning (WBLL) for enhancing L2 speaking performance: A review. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 143–152. doi:https//doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.143

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002.

Deleuze, G. (2005). Quinta Serie del Sentido:“Novena Serie de lo Problemático”: “Vigesimoprimera Serie: del Acontecimiento. La Lógica del Sentido, 50-72.

Dohn, N., & Hansen, J. J. (2014, July 7). Is learning designs something you think, do, live with, react to, or conceptualize with? Paper presented at the Designs for Learning Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, pp. 19, 221–246.

Esteve F., Castañeda L. y Adell, J. (2018). Un Modelo Holístico de Competencia Docente para el Mundo Digital. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 2018, 32.1

European Communities. (2019). Key competencies for lifelong learning, Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/569540

Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30th Anniversary Edition. New York: Continuum.

Giraldo Cadavid, D. A., & Fernández García, D. A. (2023). Aprendizajes derivados de la implementación de un dispositivo pedagógico en condiciones de enseñanza remota por Covid-19. Praxis, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.4611

Giroux, H. A. (1992). Border crossings: cultural workers and the politics of education. New York; London: Routledge.

Godin, D. & Zahedi, M. (2014). Aspects of Research through Design: A Literature Review, in Lim, Y., Niedderer, K., Redström, J., Stolterman, E. and Valtonen, A. (eds.), Design's Big Debates - DRS International Conference 2014, 16-19 June, Umeå, Sweden. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conferencepapers/drs2014/researchpapers/85

Kalaian, S. A. (2017). Distance and Online Learning. In Handbook of Research on Instructional Systems and Educational Technology (pp. 23-36). IGI Global.

Kara, S. (2021). An investigation of visual arts teachers’ attitudes towards distance education in the time of COVID-19. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 3(3), 576–588. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.246

Krippendorff, K. (2007). Design research, an oxymoron? In R. Michel (Ed.), Design research now: Essays and selected projects (pp. 67-80). Zürich

Kumaravadivelu B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macro strategies for language teaching. Yale University Press. https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=zFUvFP6e4iMC&oi=fnd&pg=PP7&dq=Beyond+Methods:macrostrategies+for+language+teaching&ots=xlXgvNpAHE&sig=qtAPfzuD3p2xgqQU_NcUM3vhNU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Beyond%20Methods%3Amacrostrategies%20for%20language%20teaching&f=false

Lastra, S., Durán, N. & Acosta, D. (2018). Community-based pedagogy is an eye–opening for pre-service teachers' initial connections with the school curriculum. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 20(2), pp. 209-229.

Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.

Long, M., Lee, Y. & Kobayashi, K. H. (2019). Task-Based Language Learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108333603

Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.

Othman, N. & Shah, M. (2013). Problem-Based Learning in the English Language Classroom. English Language Teaching. 6. 10.5539/elt.v6n3p125. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076845

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L.A., de Jong, T., Van Riesen, S.A.N., Kamp, E.T., Manoli, C.C., Zacharia, Z. C. & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14(1), 47-61. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved October 14, 2022, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/197430/.

Pikhart, M. (2018). Technology-enhanced learning experience in intercultural business communication course: a case study. In International Symposium on Emerging Technologies for Education (pp. 41–45). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03580-8_5

Puentedura, R. (2013). SAMR: Getting to transformation. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2013/04/16/SAMRGettingToTransformation.pdf

Puentedura, R. (2014). Learning, technology, and the SAMR model: Goals, processes, and practice. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/06/29/LearningTechnologySAMRModel.pdf.

Salem, A. A. M. (2019). Learning in a sheltered online scaffolding environment (SOSE). Educ Inf Technol 24, 2503–2521.

Sharkey, J., Clavijo Olarte, A. & Ramirez, L. M. (2016). Developing a deeper understanding of community-based pedagogies with teachers: Learning with and from teachers in Colombia. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 306-319.

Suhendi, A. (2018). Constructivist learning theory: The contribution to foreign language learning and teaching. KnE Social Sciences, pp. 87–95. https://knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/view/1921/4298

Thomas, M. & Reinders, H. (2010). Deconstructing tasks and technology. Task-based language learning and teaching with technology, 1-16. https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=QGkzsqQ4HaoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Deconstructing+Tasks+and+Technology.+TaskBased+Language+Learning+and+Teaching+with+Technology.&ots=nnclQn75Jg&sig=tZSoT3nx6YP77RximN3KqqUb1KY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Deconstructing%20Tasks%20and%20Technology.%20TaskBased%20Language%20Learning%20and%20Teaching%20with%20Technology.&f=false

Velásquez, R. E. (1995). Preguntar la escuela. Unidad Coordinadora de Prevención Integral. Serie Prevenir es Construir Futuro. Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá

Vogt, M. & Echevarria, J. (2008). 99 ideas and activities for teaching English learners with the SIOP model. Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.

Willis, D. & Willis, J. (2009). "Task-based language teaching: Some questions and answers." Language Teacher 33, 3, 3–8.

Zheng, R. (2008). Understanding the underlying constructs of Webquests. In Handbook of research on instructional systems and technology (pp. 752–767). IGI Global.

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2023 Praxis


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.