Palabras clave
Bibliometric Analysis
Technological Management
Socio-Economic Development
Research Trends
Cómo citar
Resumen
Innovative entrepreneurship is highly significant for fostering new opportunities that add value to businesses and society; it is a field of study that necessitates regular monitoring of the state of the art. This paper aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of innovative entrepreneurship to identify its intellectual structure and research trends, sourcing literature from Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) to conduct a bibliometric analysis. Researchers applied the Tree of Science (ToS) algorithm to discern an intellectual structure by drawing an analogy with roots, trunk, and branches, retrieving 1654 documents from Scopus and 680 from WoS, amounting to 1 795 non-duplicate documents; they observed a growing trend in scientific production, complemented by findings regarding countries, journals, authors, and their collaboration networks. Three significant trends emerged in the analysis using ToS: 1) Strategic Entrepreneurship, Digital Transformation, and Higher Education; 2) Technology as a Keystone in Entrepreneurial Innovation Ecosystems; and 3) Public Policy and Innovation Dynamics in Entrepreneurial Development. Researchers concluded that innovative entrepreneurship remains an inexhaustible field requiring further research development.Citas
Abramova, M., Lagovska, O., Dubovyk, N., Travin, V. & Liulchak, S. (2023). Digital platforms and their impact on the economic development of Ukraine. https://www.academia.edu/download/106885130/3897.pdf
Acs, Z. J., Boardman, M. C. & McNeely, C. L. (2013). The social value of productive entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9396-6
Ahn, K. & Winters, J. V. (2023). Does education enhance entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 61(2), 717–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00701-x
Alalwan, A. A., Baabdullah, A. M., Fetais, A. H. M. A., Algharabat, R. S., Raman, R. & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). SMEs entrepreneurial finance-based digital transformation: towards innovative entrepreneurial finance and entrepreneurial performance. Venture Capital, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2023.2195127
Al Qatiti, K., Abdul Talib, A. N. & Shamsudin, F. B. M. (2023). Migration Letters Knowledge and Social Economy Model and Higher Education Institutions’ Ranking: A Grounded Theory Approach. Migration Letters, 20(6), 875–897. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20i6.3533
Al-Tarawneh, A., Haddad, E., Al-Dwairi, R. M., Al-Freijat, S. Y., Mansour, A. & AL-Obaidly, G. A. (2024). The impact of strategic and innovativeness entrepreneurship and social capital on business overall performance through building a sustainable supply chain management at Jordan Private Universities. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.10.017
Angulo, E. Á. (2021). La evolución del concepto emprendimiento y su relación con la innovación y el conocimiento. Investigación & Negocios, 14(23), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.38147/invneg.v14i23.126
Basdekidou, V. & Papapanagos, H. (2023). Empirical model for estimating sustainable entrepreneurship’s growth potential and positive outlook. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2023.11.1.11
Bodolica, V. & Spraggon, M. (2021). Pure structures or ambidextrous configurations? A grounded theory of knowledge-focused organizational design in innovative ventures. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(4), 626–649. doi:10.1017/jmo.2020.34
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 1), 893–921. https://doi.org/10.1086/261712
Botero, C. M., Milanes, C. B. & Robledo, S. (2023). 50 years of the Coastal Zone Management Act: The bibliometric influence of the first coastal management law on the world. Marine Policy, 150, 105548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105548
Boutillier, S., Casadella, V. & Laperche, B. (2021). Economy – innovation economics and the dynamics of interactions. In Innovation Economics, Engineering and Management Handbook 1 (pp. 1–23). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119832492.ch1
Boutillier, S. & Uzunidis, D. (2020). Socialized Entrepreneur, Theories. In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 2195–2204). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_449
Buffart, M., Croidieu, G., Kim, P. H. & Bowman, R. (2020). Even winners need to learn: How government entrepreneurship programs can support innovative ventures. Research Policy, 49(10), 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104052
Cliff, J. E., Jennings, P. D. & Greenwood, R. (2006). New to the game and questioning the rules: The experiences and beliefs of founders who start imitative versus innovative firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 633–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.010
Crnogaj, K. & Rus, M. (2023). From Start to Scale: Navigating Innovation, Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, and Strategic Evolution. Administrative Sciences, 13(12), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13120254
Cuéllar, S., Fernández-Bajón, M. T. & De Moya-Anegón, F. (2024). Convergence between absorptive capacity and knowledge appropriation: A new methodology Mapping the hidden links. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100170
Dabić, M., Marzi, G., Vlačić, B., Daim, T. U. & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2021). 40 years of excellence: An overview of Technovation and a roadmap for future research. Technovation, 106, 102303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102303
Díez, D., Díaz-Ospina, J., Robledo, S. & del Pilar Rodríguez-Córdoba, M. (2022). Tendencias teóricas y desafíos en la comunicación de la responsabilidad social corporativa. Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación, 20(40), 146–176. https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v20n40a7
Duque, P., Cárdenas, M. & Robledo, S. (2024). Marketing social: evolución y tendencias. Entramado, 20(1), 10378. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.1.10378
Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B. & Christensen, C. (2008). Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(4), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.59
Easwaran, S. (2022). Technology and Socio-Economic Development in India. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/23939575211044800
Elert, N. & Henrekson, M. (2021). Innovative Entrepreneurship as a Collaborative Effort: An Institutional Framework. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 17(4), 330–435. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000098
Elert, N. & Henrekson, M. (2022). Improved Framework Conditions for a More Entrepreneurial, Innovative and Resilient EU. In A. Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, P. Ekman, A. Michalski, & L. Oxelheim (Eds.), Routes to a Resilient European Union: Interdisciplinary European Studies (pp. 15–38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93165-0_2
Frese, M. & Fay, D. (2001). 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6
Giannattasio, G., Kongar, E., Dabić, M., Desmond, C., Condry, M., Koushik, S. & Saracco, R. (Eds.). (2023). IEEE technology and engineering management society body of knowledge (TEMSBOK). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119987635
Gifford, E., Buenstorf, G., Ljungberg, D., McKelvey, M. & Zaring, O. (2021). Variety in founder experience and the performance of knowledge-intensive innovative firms. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 31(2), 677–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00692-6
Grisales A., A. M., Robledo, S. & Zuluaga, M. (2023). Topic Modeling: Perspectives From a Literature Review. IEEE Access, 11, 4066–4078. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232939
Gu, W. (2023). Impact of Managers’ overconfidence upon listed Firms’ entrepreneurial behavior in an emerging market. Journal of Business Research, 155(113453), 113453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113453
Henrekson, M. & Stenkula, M. (2022). William J. Baumol: Innovative Contributor to Entrepreneurship Economics. In F. Luca, S. Scott, & C. E. Suprinyak (Eds.), Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including a Symposium on the Work of William J. Baumol: Heterodox Inspirations and Neoclassical Models (Vol. 40B, pp. 107–131). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-41542022000040B010
Herhausen, D., Morgan, R. E., Brozović, D. & Volberda, H. W. (2021). Re-examining Strategic Flexibility: A Meta-Analysis of its Antecedents, Consequences and Contingencies. British Journal of Management, 32(2), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12413
Hryshchenko, I., Hanushchak-Efimenko, L., Hnatenko, I. & Rebilas, R. (2023). Management of the design environment for the development of innovative entrepreneurship in integrated structures in the conditions of post-war recovery. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 5(52), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.5.52.2023.4199
Huarng, K.-H. & Yu, T. H.-K. (2022). Causal complexity analysis for fintech adoption at the country level. Journal of Business Research, 153, 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.030
Kirzner, I. M. (1978, September). Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press; pu3430623_3430810. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo27304815.html
López-Muñoz, J. F., Novejarque-Civera, J. & Pisá-Bó, M. (2023). Innovative entrepreneurial behavior in high-income European countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 29(7), 1516–1540. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-06-2022-0546
Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management Review. Academy of Management, 21(1), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
Malerba, F. & McKelvey, M. (2020). Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics, 54(2), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2
Marcotte, C. (2014). Entrepreneurship and innovation in emerging economies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 20(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-09-2012-0089
Mayhew, M. J., Simonoff, J. S., Baumol, W. J., Wiesenfeld, B. M. & Klein, M. W. (2012). Exploring Innovative Entrepreneurship and Its Ties to Higher Educational Experiences. Research in Higher Education, 53(8), 831–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9258-3
Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a Service: The Promise and Perils of Work in the Gig Economy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797012.001.0001
Priem, R. L., Li, S. & Carr, J. C. (2012). Insights and New Directions from Demand-Side Approaches to Technology Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management Research. Journal of Management, 38(1), 346–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311429614
Qasim, D., BanyMohammed, A. & Liñán, F. (2023). The Theoretical Basis of Relevant E-Entrepreneurship Results: A Systematic Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2023.10051152
Robledo-Giraldo, S., Figueroa-Camargo, J. G., Zuluaga-Rojas, M. V., Vélez-Escobar, S. B. & Hurtado, P. L. D.-. (2023). Mapping, evolution, and application trends in co-citation analysis: a scientometric approach. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo E Innovación, 13(1), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v13.n1.2023.16070
Robledo, S., Eider, V. J., Darío, D.-M. N. & Duque-Uribe, V. (2022). Networking as an entrepreneurial marketing tool: the link between effectuation and word of mouth. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 25(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-08-2020-0112
Samuelsson, M. & Davidsson, P. (2009). Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9093-7
Schumpeter, J. A. (1976). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. (1a ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203202050
Schumpeter, J. A. & Swedberg, R. (2021). The theory of economic development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003146766
Sharif, N. (2012). Facilitating and promoting innovative entrepreneurship in Hong Kong: Theory and practice. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L Administration, 29(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.230
Svitlychnyy, O., Teremetskyi, V., Herasymiuk, P., Kravchuk, P. & Knysh, S. (2023). State policy for the development of innovative entrepreneurship: Experience of Ukraine. Revista de la Universidad del Zulia, 14(39), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.39.15
Urbano, D., Audretsch, D., Aparicio, S. & Noguera, M. (2020). Does entrepreneurial activity matter for economic growth in developing countries? The role of the institutional environment. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1065–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00621-5
Uriarte, S., Mandakovic, V. & Amorós, J. E. (2023). Hybrid entrepreneurs: The value of experience. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2023.2284911
Vivares, J. A., Avella, L. & Sarache, W. (2022). Tendencias y retos de investigación en estrategia de operaciones: hallazgos de una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Cuadernos de Gestión, 22(2), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211543ja
Wang, H., Zhao, T., Cooper, S. Y., Wang, S., Harrison, R. T. & Yang, Z. (2022). Effective policy mixes in entrepreneurial ecosystems: a configurational analysis in China. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00658-x
Wennekers, S. & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008063200484
Wihlborg, E. & Iacobaeus, H. (2023). Context matters—different entrepreneurial approaches among street‐level bureaucrats enhancing digital inclusion. European Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1197
Yadav, U. S., Tripathi, R., Tripathi, M. A., Ghosal, I., Kumar, A., Mandal, M. & Singh, A. (2023). Digital and innovative entrepreneurship in the Indian handicraft sector after the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00337-5
Zaring, O., Szücs, S. & McKelvey, M. (2021). Building regional innovation capacity: linking knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship and innovation governance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Small Business, 42(1/2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijesb.2021.112259
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2024 Clío América